I'm so glad that we have an Administration that is commited to transparency in government. After all, with all the statements about it, it makes sense that the White House would move to eliminate access to about half of the 2000 or so US government websites. Joe Biden is taking the lead, so we can all imagine how well this is going to go! They say that eliminating access or suppressing the sites will improve peoples ability to find information, and how can we doubt that? With the White House overseeing the project, with an eye towards content, I"m sure we will all have access to exactly what the Crypto-Fascist Cabal in Power the progressive administration wants us to know--no more, no less. They say it will cut waste and duplication, and we can tell from other activities just how committed they are to eliminating waste, and duplicated efforts and muddled structures: just look at all the Czars.
This commitment to transparency is filtering down into Federal law enforcement people as well. Take the case of Vince Cefalu. This guy is a Special Agent for the ATF, and has been handed walking papers after 24 years of service. He is being fired for his connection to Project Gunrunner, the operation that let large numbers of firearms into Mexico and the hands of the drug cartels. He didn't participate, he was one of the whistle blowers. Yep. a Federal Law Enforcement Officer exposed criminal acts, and was fired for it. Cefalu, with 24years of service, first encountered difficulties in 2005, when wiretaps were used illegally to gather evidence. he had an unbroken string of outstanding evaluations. now his evaluations are not outstanding, and he has even been criticized for "hygiene". At least two members of congress have complained in writing to the ATF about retaliation. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa has noted to the ATF, and publicly, that one agent was accused of misconduct for talking to a Senator about the Gunrunner operation!
Now the FBI quietly--until the New York Times found out and publicized it--expanded the powers of it's agents. The FBI, not the Federal Courts or Congress. They now have wider authority--from their own Agency, of course, to search, surveille, go through trash etc. They are using guidelines from the Attorney General--the same guy who will not prosecute cases of voter intimidation and racial intimidation by groups felt to be sympathetic to the Crypto-Fascist Regime Current Progressive Regime we all enjoy. This is under a category of investigation called "assessment"--a proactive form of investigation that allows the FBI to investigate groups and individuals with no evidence or reason to suspect criminal activities on the part of those under scrutiny. In other words, fishing expeditions against those the Administration of the Bureau dislike. i wonder how many of us remember the outrage the Democrats expressed over this sort of thing when directed towards the Radical Left in the 60s and 70s, and towards liberal and progressive elements by Director Hoover. They don't like equal protection, that's for damned sure. (Don't forget they have tried to convince law enforcement that pro-lifers, gun owners, conservative tax protestors, TEA Party activists and free speech proponents who are not liberal are potential terrorists.)
This is trickling down fast! A recent hack of the Arizona State Police showed them preparing documents and advising street cops to prevent Cell Phone apps from recording their conduct, to provide a record independent of the police of the actions of the police. This is a clear violation of civil rights--because it is a settled point of law that if you are in a place it is legal for you to be, seeing things happening in public, you have right to photograph or record. In one case, a New Jersey high school girl was arrested for recording the activities of the police on a public bus. In another case in Valejo California, and man was arrested for recording video of the police arresting a man from inside his own home. In Rochester New York, a woman was arrested for videotaping police from her front yard. The police told her that she was "very anti-police" for "what she said" before she started taping them. They then said that they felt threatened by her (with a video camera?) and ordered her to stop and to go into her house. Then they arrested her. Let's be clear about something--the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that exercising your rights isn't and cannot be incriminating, or a crime, consistently since 1845, and that photographing or recording from a location you are lawfully in, of events in public, is a First Amendment right. (without that, photo journalism and Broadcast journalism could not exist!) Such transparency in America!
Of course,TSA is famous for being responsive to concerns of the people about privacy, and the need for transparency in it's selection and training, and in it's equipment safety. That's why Napolitano insists that the enhanced pat downs are 'discrete'. Because she says so. (Facts? Why use facts! We have her statements!) Odd, they are so open that it turns out that their assurances of the safety of airport scanners are not factually correct, and that they didn't pass rigorous safety evaluations. In fact Johns Hopkins found that the field around the scanners exceeds the General Public Dose Limit, and that one researcher, who runs an X-ray lab at Johns Hopkins Department of Biophysics (Michael Love) has stated that statistically, people are going to get skin cancer from the scanners. TSA workers are told to stand as far from he machines as possible. Other scientists agree, and the EPA as well. The dose is over 200 times what we were told. I'm very glad they were open about this.
I'm so glad the the Government and Law Enforcement aren't developing a culture of concealment and intimidation.
I just wish I still had my Enumerated Liberties and didn't have to be afraid of the Feds because of my Blog.